03:18 01 May 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The DOE states that the Korean grid data have been correctly used as per the methodology. However, the DOE did not provide validation opinion on the assumptions for grid loss used in the calculation of the emission reduction and the validation report does not include any relevant references. The DOE is requested to provide a validation opinion on the assumption used for grid emission loss and any relevant references required for the validation of the loss.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how the data/parameters used in the equations were verified as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 93.
The water flow in table B6 of the PDD is shown incorrectly as it shows the new water flow rather than the baseline flow.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 49 Annex 22 paragraph 8 b.
The PDD and the validation report indicate that there is more than two year gap between the project starting date of 14/09/07 and the validation commenced on 27/07/10. Further information is required how the DOE validated the prior consideration as per Annex 13 of EB62 as the validation report does not contain information required by para 7 and 8 of Annex 13.
1: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The DOE states that the Korean grid data have been correctly used as per the methodology. However, the DOE did not provide validation opinion on the assumptions for grid loss used in the calculation of the emission reduction and the validation report does not include any relevant references. The DOE is requested to provide a validation opinion on the assumption used for grid emission loss and any relevant references required for the validation of the loss.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how the data/parameters used in the equations were verified as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 93.
The water flow in table B6 of the PDD is shown incorrectly as it shows the new water flow rather than the baseline flow.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 49 Annex 22 paragraph 8 b.
The PDD and the validation report indicate that there is more than two year gap between the project starting date of 14/09/07 and the validation commenced on 27/07/10. Further information is required how the DOE validated the prior consideration as per Annex 13 of EB62 as the validation report does not contain information required by para 7 and 8 of Annex 13.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: