Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
(i)- The Validation Report (page 18) states that: ¨The input parameters used in the financial analysis were compared with the data reported for other similar small-scale hydropower CDM projects in Viet Nam comparing the investment costs per MW, electricity tariff, percentage of O&M costs relative to total investment costs¨. However the Validation Report does not report the verified values of the projects used for the comparison.
(ii) A yearly escalation in the O&M costs has been applied in the spreadsheet submitted, however the Validation Report does not present information on the validation of this input value used.

2: The DOE is requested to include appointment certificate or CV of each validation team member as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 174 (g).
PAge 11 of the Validation Report states that the qualification of each individual validation team member is detailed in Appendix C, however Appendix C cannot be found.

3: The DOE is requested to resolve all CARs and CLs raised as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 37.
As per the Validation Report page 9, Table 3 of the validation protocol describes any changes made to this version of the PDD as a result of CARs and CLs raised by DNV. However CARs, CLs and potential FARs have not been reported as there is no Table 3 in the Validation Protocol. Please submit a complete Validation Report.