Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all relevant assumptions, data, input values and references used in the investment analysis and the results of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
In doing so please confirm if the information provided in the PDD (Table B-5) is consistent with the content in the referenced registered CDM project activities (i.e. The PDD shows a unit investment cost of 122,614 Yuan/kW for project 0689 while the registered 0689 indicates 10,445 Yuan/kW).

2: The DOE is requested to identify if the FSR has been the basis of the investment decision as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 113 (a).
In doing so please clarify the inconsistency in the FSR completion date as the PDD timeline indicates May 2009 while page 14 shows November 2009; while the investment decision was made in August 2009.

3: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated common practice analysis as per EB61 Annex21 para 47 (steps 2&3).
In doing so the PP/DOE are requested to: i) identify all the plants delivering the same output (Nall) and applying technologies different (Ndiff) from the proposed project activity in the region, and ii) provide information clarifying the start date (27/11/2009) for the commercial operation of one of the projects included in the Nall list.

4: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated the scope of the common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (a).
In doing so the DOE is requested to provide information supporting the justifications on the geographical and social-economic differences given by the PP in determining the applicable geographical area.