Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe whether the assumptions and data used for the baseline identification are justified appropriately, supported by evidence and can be deemed reasonable as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 87 (c),
in particular, evidences used for F3: burning fossil fuel with different fuel mixture. In doing so, the DOE shall report the data vintage of coal price, and further explain why the coal price is deemed higher than petcoke price considering a new kiln fueled by coal will be built by PP in the project site.

2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In doing so, the DOE shall validate how investment cost applied in the investment analysis has been cross checked in line with VVM v1.2, para. 111 (b).

3:
The DOE mentioned "no barrier analysis was used to demonstrate additionality" in validation report, page 60, while barrier analysis has been validated in the rest parts of the validation report. The DOE shall clarify the inconsistency.