Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The validation report lacks information why only 3 years of data were used to determine parameter EGOC and EFHIST, given that the emission reductions spreadsheet shows that 4 years of data are available.

2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
The validation report has not justified why there are two types of variable costs (EUR/MWh and Rial/MWh) for each open cycle and combined cycle.

3: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the existence of the similar projects for common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121 (b).
The validation report has not explained how the application of the common practice analysis complies with the EB63 Annex 12, as: (1) Step 2 of the analysis only lists combined cycle power plants; (2) Step 3 only identifies combined cycle power plants that have different technologies.