18:17 29 Apr 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
In doing so, please provide information on how it has considered the requirements by "Tool for the identification of degraded or degrading lands for consideration in implementing CDM A/R project activities"version 1 in validating the project land.
2: The DOE is requested to provide a statement whether the identified boundary, sources and gases are justified for the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 80.
In particular, to provide validation on how the boundary was identified according to "Guidance on Application of the Definition of the Project Boundary to A/R CDM Project Activities" version 1.
3: The DOE is requested to describe the steps taken to assess the identification of the baseline scenario of the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 87.
In doing so, please provide information on how it has assessed the each step of the "Combined tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate additionality" version 3.0.1 taken to identify the baseline scenario.
4: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
In particular, the DOE shall explain how it has validated the baseline sink and the actual net GHG removal by sinks in line with the applied methodology. In doing so, please provide information on the validation of each of the methodological choice for the calculations and the parameters applied to the chosen equations.
5: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
In doing so, please confirm that the date indicated as the starting date is the earliest date when real actions takes place for the project activity as per the latest CDM glossary of terms.
6: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
In doing so, please provide clear statements on the specific events that are considered as the prior considerations and why.
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
In doing so, please provide information on how it has considered the requirements by "Tool for the identification of degraded or degrading lands for consideration in implementing CDM A/R project activities"version 1 in validating the project land.
2: The DOE is requested to provide a statement whether the identified boundary, sources and gases are justified for the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 80.
In particular, to provide validation on how the boundary was identified according to "Guidance on Application of the Definition of the Project Boundary to A/R CDM Project Activities" version 1.
3: The DOE is requested to describe the steps taken to assess the identification of the baseline scenario of the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 87.
In doing so, please provide information on how it has assessed the each step of the "Combined tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate additionality" version 3.0.1 taken to identify the baseline scenario.
4: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
In particular, the DOE shall explain how it has validated the baseline sink and the actual net GHG removal by sinks in line with the applied methodology. In doing so, please provide information on the validation of each of the methodological choice for the calculations and the parameters applied to the chosen equations.
5: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
In doing so, please confirm that the date indicated as the starting date is the earliest date when real actions takes place for the project activity as per the latest CDM glossary of terms.
6: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
In doing so, please provide clear statements on the specific events that are considered as the prior considerations and why.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: