18:54 27 Aug 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to provide the information about the greenhouse gas emissions within the project boundary caused by the implementation of the project activity which contribute to more than 1% of the expected annual emission reductions ER/year and which are not addressed in by the applied methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 77.
The validation report does not contain the information on the greenhouse gas emission caused by the implementation of the project activity which contributes to more than 1% of the expected annual emission reductions that are not addressed by the applied methodology.
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
a) There are two types of biomass used in the project activity (e.g. rice husk and bagasse) as per the description of the project activity in the PDD and validation report whereas the financial calculation considers only one type of biomass (rice husk) for determining the IRR and also the price of the bagasse, if any, has not been validated by the DOE.
b) The reference list presented in Section 6 of the VR does not include the references numbered 30 to 37.
3: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
The PDD indicates that the generators (2x1.5MW) used prior to the project activity will be kept as stand by. The monitoring plan does not include any provision for monitoring the electricity generated in case these two generators were used.
1: The DOE is requested to provide the information about the greenhouse gas emissions within the project boundary caused by the implementation of the project activity which contribute to more than 1% of the expected annual emission reductions ER/year and which are not addressed in by the applied methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 77.
The validation report does not contain the information on the greenhouse gas emission caused by the implementation of the project activity which contributes to more than 1% of the expected annual emission reductions that are not addressed by the applied methodology.
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
a) There are two types of biomass used in the project activity (e.g. rice husk and bagasse) as per the description of the project activity in the PDD and validation report whereas the financial calculation considers only one type of biomass (rice husk) for determining the IRR and also the price of the bagasse, if any, has not been validated by the DOE.
b) The reference list presented in Section 6 of the VR does not include the references numbered 30 to 37.
3: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
The PDD indicates that the generators (2x1.5MW) used prior to the project activity will be kept as stand by. The monitoring plan does not include any provision for monitoring the electricity generated in case these two generators were used.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: