Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The validation report should include a clear description of the applicability conditions of the methodology AMS-I.D for each component of the bundle. Please notice that the PDD mentions that
for sub-bundle 1 and sub-bundle 2 the electricity will be initially sold to the grid and then wheeled to private users. For sub-bundled 3 it indicates that the electricity will be wheeled for captive compsumption.

2: The DOE is requested to provide a statement whether the identified boundary, sources and gases are justified for the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 80.
For each one of the three components of the bundle, the PDD and the validation report must separately indicate a clear description of: (a) the baseline scenario; (b) the type of grid used to deliver the electricity; (c) the recipient of the electricity generated.

3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 49 Annex 22 paragraph 8 b.
The table used to validate the continuing and real actions to secure CDM is not consistent. Sub-bundle 3 appears to have different composition: 3 turbines on January 21, 2006; and 1 turbine on February 18, 2006. Please revise the table and name adequately each component of the bundle.

4: The DOE is requested to confirm the accuracy of the financial calculations carried out for the investment analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (c).
The DOE shall ensure the consistency of the documentation submitted. Please notice that the PDD indicates that the IRR for the Sub-bundle 2 is 9.57%. Nevertheless the validation report and the investment analysis spreadsheet consider a value of 10.13% for the same sub-bundle. Please clarify.

5: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
For each component of the bundle, the validation report should properly explain how the suitability of the input values to the investment analysis have been validated, in particular: O&M cost, capital cost and the applicability of a tariff of 2.7 for sub-bundle 3 for the first 2 years. Please notice that the VR does not contain details on how these values have been validated. The DOE shall refer to paragraph 111 (b) of the VVM 1.2 guidance.