Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to describe the procedure taken to demonstrate additionality of the project activity as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
According to page 13 of PDD and page 28 of Validation Report, the project comprises of two extensions (I & II) with individual construction contracts signed on different dates. However, the investment analysis spreadsheet presents a combined analysis for both the extensions.

2: The PP/DOE are requested to list all relevant assumptions, data, input values and references used in the investment analysis and the results of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The references used for input parameters used in investment analysis like total investment etc. are not consistent in PDD and Validation Report. According to page 16, Table 6 of PDD; the data source for input parameters like Total investment, O&M cost has been given as Suppliers contract. Whereas page 29 of Validation Report mentions that these cost figures have been budgeted by PP at the time of making the investment decision, i.e. end of the year 2007 based on available quotations and based on the experience gathered with the construction of the first wind park.