21:55 20 Sep 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to state if the baseline methodology is correctly applied to calculate project/baseline emissions, leakage and emission reductions as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(d).
In doing so, please clarify the inconsistency in the applied methodology as the validation report (pg 103) and Appendix 2 show ACM0002 while the PDD and other parts of the VR indicate AMS-I.D.
2: The DOE is requested to include a clear validation opinion on the compliance of the project activity with the requirements made in EB 49 Annex 22 as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 104(c).
In doing so please provide the dates for each sub-bundle when the secretariat and the DNA were informed about the intention to seek the CDM status .
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In doing so please clarify the inconsistency in the project cost as the validation report (Annex 3) indicates that project ID. 1 applied a value of 12.15 Million INR/Turbine and project IDs. 2 to11 applied a value of 11.53 Million INR/Turbine while the PDD and the excel sheet show that all the sub-bundles (project IDs. 1 to 11) applied a value of 10.30 Million INR/Turbine
4: The DOE is requested to include a list of interviewees and document reviewed as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 174 (d).
In doing so please provide the documents listed under the following references: /LAND/, /PDD7/, /WO/, /INS/, /CHRO/ and /unfccc-letter/. In addition please ensure that all referenced documents have been dated.
1: The DOE is requested to state if the baseline methodology is correctly applied to calculate project/baseline emissions, leakage and emission reductions as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(d).
In doing so, please clarify the inconsistency in the applied methodology as the validation report (pg 103) and Appendix 2 show ACM0002 while the PDD and other parts of the VR indicate AMS-I.D.
2: The DOE is requested to include a clear validation opinion on the compliance of the project activity with the requirements made in EB 49 Annex 22 as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 104(c).
In doing so please provide the dates for each sub-bundle when the secretariat and the DNA were informed about the intention to seek the CDM status .
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In doing so please clarify the inconsistency in the project cost as the validation report (Annex 3) indicates that project ID. 1 applied a value of 12.15 Million INR/Turbine and project IDs. 2 to11 applied a value of 11.53 Million INR/Turbine while the PDD and the excel sheet show that all the sub-bundles (project IDs. 1 to 11) applied a value of 10.30 Million INR/Turbine
4: The DOE is requested to include a list of interviewees and document reviewed as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 174 (d).
In doing so please provide the documents listed under the following references: /LAND/, /PDD7/, /WO/, /INS/, /CHRO/ and /unfccc-letter/. In addition please ensure that all referenced documents have been dated.

Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: