07:45 20 Jan 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to include the details of each monitoring parameter listed as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The description of each parameter should include what the measured parameter is; for example, for EGM1, in addition to "quantity of electricity measured by the Meter M1", the description should include what Meter M1 measures, such as "gross output by the project activity wind turbines".
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular, please explain how it has validated the VAT of 8.5% and if there are any applicable tax reimbursement policies.
3: The DOE is requested to provide local and sectoral expertise on the suitability of the input values to the investment analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 113 (c).
In doing so, the DOE is requested to provide the details of the seven "similar projects" used for the comparison of the investment, the O&M costs and the PLF, considering that this is the first wind power project in the province. Also, please clarify if there is no more wind farms other than those 7 projects in the selected area.
4: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated the scope of the common practice analysis as per paragraphs 5, 9 and 47 of Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality version 6.
In particular, it should be justified why the geographical area is limited to the province while the guideline applied specifies the default geographical area to be the whole host country.
5: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
In particular, the DOE shall clarify how it has validated: a) the monitoring of the net electricity output to the grid to be conservative, in particular, the calculation method used for the transmission losses; b) details of the connection with Wanao hydropower plant; and c) how the invoice will be issued: i) which meter measurements the amount of electricity for the invoice will be based on for the project activity, and ii) the apportioning method applied, if applicable.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to include the details of each monitoring parameter listed as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The description of each parameter should include what the measured parameter is; for example, for EGM1, in addition to "quantity of electricity measured by the Meter M1", the description should include what Meter M1 measures, such as "gross output by the project activity wind turbines".
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular, please explain how it has validated the VAT of 8.5% and if there are any applicable tax reimbursement policies.
3: The DOE is requested to provide local and sectoral expertise on the suitability of the input values to the investment analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 113 (c).
In doing so, the DOE is requested to provide the details of the seven "similar projects" used for the comparison of the investment, the O&M costs and the PLF, considering that this is the first wind power project in the province. Also, please clarify if there is no more wind farms other than those 7 projects in the selected area.
4: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated the scope of the common practice analysis as per paragraphs 5, 9 and 47 of Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality version 6.
In particular, it should be justified why the geographical area is limited to the province while the guideline applied specifies the default geographical area to be the whole host country.
5: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
In particular, the DOE shall clarify how it has validated: a) the monitoring of the net electricity output to the grid to be conservative, in particular, the calculation method used for the transmission losses; b) details of the connection with Wanao hydropower plant; and c) how the invoice will be issued: i) which meter measurements the amount of electricity for the invoice will be based on for the project activity, and ii) the apportioning method applied, if applicable.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: