13:57 13 Jul 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe how the data/parameters used in the equations were verified as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 93.
VR p31 states that ratios of 70%, 80% and 90% are respectively applied in the emission reduction calculations in the first three years of operation, in consistency with the financial analysis of the project. This is also addressed in CAR 17 which was closed
However, in the ER calculation spreadsheet, it is applied 80% the first year, 90% the second year and 100% from the 3rd year onward.
2: The DOE is requested to identify if the PDD has been updated and rectified according to the responses to the CARs, CLs and or FARs raised during validation as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 39.
It is not clear if the conclusions of CAR 17 are reflected in the emission reduction spreadsheet.
1: The DOE is requested to describe how the data/parameters used in the equations were verified as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 93.
VR p31 states that ratios of 70%, 80% and 90% are respectively applied in the emission reduction calculations in the first three years of operation, in consistency with the financial analysis of the project. This is also addressed in CAR 17 which was closed
However, in the ER calculation spreadsheet, it is applied 80% the first year, 90% the second year and 100% from the 3rd year onward.
2: The DOE is requested to identify if the PDD has been updated and rectified according to the responses to the CARs, CLs and or FARs raised during validation as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 39.
It is not clear if the conclusions of CAR 17 are reflected in the emission reduction spreadsheet.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: