Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to explain the methodological choices for the calculation of the baseline, project emissions and emission reductions as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
Equation 5 of the applied methodology that calculates the power density has been interpreted as not requiring a calculation because the PDD indicates that there is no change in reservoir capacity. However, given the project is a capacity addition and not a greenfield project, the calculation is required even if there is no change in reservoir capacity.

2: The DOE is requested to confirm the accuracy of the financial calculations carried out for the investment analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (c).
The DOE is requested to clarify how it validated the suitability of the PLF for the added capacity to be 35.4% considering that the existing 15.24 MW capacity utilizing the same reservoir has a calculated PLF of between 68-70%. In addition, the validation report does not contain any opinion regarding why there is such a large discrepancy between the PLF for the project activity’s added capacity (43 MW) and the existing 15.24 MW capacity.

3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
The DOE is requested to clarify how to validated that the project activity electricity output is unlikely to increase more than 16.9%, considering that such an output is achieved with a PLF of only 39 to 40% (from 35.4%) and the existing 15.24 MW capacity has a calculated PLF of between 68-70%.