03:02 20 Aug 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list the data and parameters used to calculate the emission reductions as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE are request to provide data and parameters of individual energy efficiency measures of the project activity in the section of B.6.2 of the PDD as the PDD does not provide the baseline emission of the measures determined at the validation.
2: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The DOE (p.19) states that "Reference for all the values taken i.e. Energy Efficiency Design Assistance Report is submitted by the PP" and "Validation team has verified the Energy Efficiency Design Assistance Report and found to be satisfactory. CAR point is closed." However, the DOE does not provide its opinion on how these values in the report has been assessed as per para 92(a) of VVM version 1.2
3: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE is required to provide the information on why it considers that the values used in the baseline emission are appropriate and conservative as per para 91 of VVM version 1.2. as the validation report does not contain relevant information.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list the data and parameters used to calculate the emission reductions as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP/DOE are request to provide data and parameters of individual energy efficiency measures of the project activity in the section of B.6.2 of the PDD as the PDD does not provide the baseline emission of the measures determined at the validation.
2: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The DOE (p.19) states that "Reference for all the values taken i.e. Energy Efficiency Design Assistance Report is submitted by the PP" and "Validation team has verified the Energy Efficiency Design Assistance Report and found to be satisfactory. CAR point is closed." However, the DOE does not provide its opinion on how these values in the report has been assessed as per para 92(a) of VVM version 1.2
3: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE is required to provide the information on why it considers that the values used in the baseline emission are appropriate and conservative as per para 91 of VVM version 1.2. as the validation report does not contain relevant information.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: