Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to verify the justification and appropriateness of the fixed data and parameters used for the emission reduction calculations as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 142 (a), 144 (a) (b) (c) and 145.
Responding to the previous issue raised, the PP/DOE have corrected the EFCO2i of the fuel used in the calculation of the grid emission factor. However, it is now observed that the fuel type of some power plants has been changed from previously “Diesel” to “Gas” (power plants J. Brown #5, J. Brown #6, B.L.M. #8, B.L.M. #9, T.G.-Panamá (rehabilitada) and Copesa), and the emission factor of the gas appears to still use the emission factor of diesel. The DOE needs to explain the appropriateness of the applied EFCO2i for these power plants.

2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology(ies) and/or standardized baseline(s) as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 149 (a) (c) and 150 (a), and where applicable SS version 04.1 section 6.
(a) After responding to the incompleteness during the initial request for registration, the provision for monitored parameter EFCO2i, used for calculation of project emissions, has been changed from upper limit to lower limit of IPCC value. The DOE is requested to explain how this is in accordance with the applied “Tool to calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion” (version 2), which requires the use of upper limit of IPCC value;
(b) The DOE is also requested to clarify the inconsistency for monitored parameter NCVi,y that is used to calculate project emissions. The PDD mentions that upper limit of IPCC value will be used, whereas the validation report states the lower limit of IPCC value will be used.