Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all relevant assumptions, data, input values and references used in the investment analysis and the results of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The DOE is requested to provide further clarification on how it verified the i) the Plant Load Factor for the project and ii) the different components of the O&M costs in accordance with paragraph 111 of the V.V.M version 1.2.

2: The PP/DOE are requested to present common practice analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
Page 34 of the Validation Report states that the Common Practice was demonstrated as per Step 4 of the "Additionality Tool” and latest rules issued by EB.However the DOE is requested to provide further clarification on :i)which Guidelines has been followed to demonstrate Common Practice,ii) how it verified Common Practice analysis in accordance with paragraph 120 of the V.V.M version 1.2.

3: The PP/DOE are requested to explain the methodological choices for the calculation of the baseline, project emissions and emission reductions as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The "Tool for the emission factor for an electricity system"(EB 63 Annex 19) Page 5 states that "For grid power plants, use a 3-year generation-weighted average, based on the most recent data available at the time of submission of the CDM-PDD to the DOE for validation." The DOE is requested to further clarify why the emission factor has not been calculated with the values available during the time of PDD submission.