Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
The DOE is requested to clarify the inconsistency in the date of submission of the CDM prior consideration notification given that the PDD states notification submitted to the UNFCCC on 17/02/2011 and to the Chilean DNA on 18/02/2011 where as the validation report (page 11) states that notification submitted to both the UNFCCC and the DNA on 17/02/2011.

2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
a). The DOE is requested to clarify the source used to validate the water right cost given that the validation report page 13 states that the cost was based on the agreement between Hidroelectrica Providencia and the Maule Channel Association where as page 3 states agreement for water rights between Inversiones Herborn Ltda. and ACM dated 9 October 2009.

b). The DOE is requested to further validate the suitability of the electricity tariff. In doing so, the DOE shall clarify:
i) the calculation of spot average price based on spot dry and spot humid as mentioned in the IRR spreadhsset.
ii) variation in node energy price from 1st to 9th year and it remains constant from 10th year onwards at 62.52 USD/MWh
iii) variation in spot price from 1st year to 10th year and it remains constant from 11th year onwards at 62.52 USD/MWh
c). Please clarify the cross checking method for the input parameters Transmission and substation tolls and water right cost.