20:15 11 Nov 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
The PP/DOE are requested to present the sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The DOE is requested to further explain how it has validated that the investment cost is not likely to reduce by 9.6%, particularly the following:
a) Inflation - The DOE is requested to further substantiate inflation trends based on documented evidence to validate that investment cost is not likely to reduce.
b) Remaining cost - Since the PP has already incurred the major construction and hydro-mechanical costs related to the project, the DOE shall provide further information on the remaining cost items estimated in the FSR; electrical, compensation, project management expense and contingency.
The PP/DOE are requested to present the sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The DOE is requested to further explain how it has validated that the investment cost is not likely to reduce by 9.6%, particularly the following:
a) Inflation - The DOE is requested to further substantiate inflation trends based on documented evidence to validate that investment cost is not likely to reduce.
b) Remaining cost - Since the PP has already incurred the major construction and hydro-mechanical costs related to the project, the DOE shall provide further information on the remaining cost items estimated in the FSR; electrical, compensation, project management expense and contingency.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: