05:39 21 Sep 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all sections of the PDD related to the description of the project activity as per PS version 2.1 paragraphs 30-34.
The DOE has validated that the installed capacity is 450MW for each unit and 900MW in total, however, the PDD page 3 states that the maximum capacity is 820MW. Please rectify the inconsistency. The PP/DOE is also requested to clarify how the annual electricity supplied to the consumers is calculated (i.e. 4,674GWh/year as per page 3 and page 5 of the PDD) based on the technical specifications provided in the Table 1 of PDD page 5.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVS version 3 paragraphs 76 and 77.
The DOE is requested to provide the information on how it has validated the prediction of future natural gas power capacity additions as well as the future natural gas consumption, to demonstrate that the natural gas is sufficiently available in the region/country.
3: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the project starting date as per VVS version 3 paragraphs 112 (a).
The DOE is requested to provide the information on the nature of the "Framework Agreement" between the SJSC “Uzbekenergo” and the
company Synecta. i.e. whether it includes EPC contract or it is only CDM consultancy/CER purchase contract. Further, the DOE is requested to provide the information on how it has validated the project start date. i.e. 25/06/2012 when the aforementioned "Framework Agreement" was signed. In doing so, the DOE is requested to provide the total contracted value to demonstrate that this is the major commitment and funding allocation to the proposed CDM project.
4: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the suitability of the input values used in the financial calculations as per VVS version 3 paragraphs 120, 122 and 123(a).
The DOE is requested to provide detail information on how each input value used in the levelized cost analysis for each alternative and IRR calculation has been cross checked in line with VVS version 3 para 120(b), (c) and 122(c). In particular, the total installed capacity for each year, PLF for each year, investment cost, fuel cost, electricity tariff, annual power supplied to the consumer, Maintenance and management costs, Water costs and Capital repair, etc. In doing so, the DOE is requested to list the appropriate evidences that reviewed to cross check each input value for financial indicator calculation, provide the relevant figures/values from the cross checking sources transparently and justify the accuracy and suitability of each value applied.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all sections of the PDD related to the description of the project activity as per PS version 2.1 paragraphs 30-34.
The DOE has validated that the installed capacity is 450MW for each unit and 900MW in total, however, the PDD page 3 states that the maximum capacity is 820MW. Please rectify the inconsistency. The PP/DOE is also requested to clarify how the annual electricity supplied to the consumers is calculated (i.e. 4,674GWh/year as per page 3 and page 5 of the PDD) based on the technical specifications provided in the Table 1 of PDD page 5.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVS version 3 paragraphs 76 and 77.
The DOE is requested to provide the information on how it has validated the prediction of future natural gas power capacity additions as well as the future natural gas consumption, to demonstrate that the natural gas is sufficiently available in the region/country.
3: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the project starting date as per VVS version 3 paragraphs 112 (a).
The DOE is requested to provide the information on the nature of the "Framework Agreement" between the SJSC “Uzbekenergo” and the
company Synecta. i.e. whether it includes EPC contract or it is only CDM consultancy/CER purchase contract. Further, the DOE is requested to provide the information on how it has validated the project start date. i.e. 25/06/2012 when the aforementioned "Framework Agreement" was signed. In doing so, the DOE is requested to provide the total contracted value to demonstrate that this is the major commitment and funding allocation to the proposed CDM project.
4: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the suitability of the input values used in the financial calculations as per VVS version 3 paragraphs 120, 122 and 123(a).
The DOE is requested to provide detail information on how each input value used in the levelized cost analysis for each alternative and IRR calculation has been cross checked in line with VVS version 3 para 120(b), (c) and 122(c). In particular, the total installed capacity for each year, PLF for each year, investment cost, fuel cost, electricity tariff, annual power supplied to the consumer, Maintenance and management costs, Water costs and Capital repair, etc. In doing so, the DOE is requested to list the appropriate evidences that reviewed to cross check each input value for financial indicator calculation, provide the relevant figures/values from the cross checking sources transparently and justify the accuracy and suitability of each value applied.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: