Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology(ies) as per VVS version 9 paragraph 149 (a).
The PDD (pg.7) has provided an indicative metering diagram which shows that common metering (i.e. project and non-project WTGs) will be done at the substation. The monitoring plan has listed three parameters (EG facility(Export),y, EG facility(Import),y, and EG facility,y.

The PDD (pages 25 & 26) reported that “The electricity generated by the Project Promoter-WTG (along with non-Project Promoter WTGs) is metered at common metering point through given feeder. The metering point consists of a main meter & check meter (ABT meters), having accuracy of 0.2s or better.”

The apportioning procedure (PDD page 28 & 29) indicates the following parameters for calculating the EG facility : (i) GR : Generation Ratio at metering point; (ii) EG Controller, WTG : Electricity generated by installed WTG of PP connected to the applicable metering point, (iii) EG Controller, Total : Total generation by all the connected WTGs to the applicable metering point; (iv) EG Import, Total : Total Import, kWh by all the WTGs at the metering point; and (v) EG Export, total : Total Export, kWh by all the WTGs at the metering point. The DOE (VR page 29) confirms that “The value of the net energy exported by the project activity is calculated based on the apportioning procedure”.

However, information for the monitoring of parameters EGcontroller,WTG, EGcontroller,Total, EG import,Total and EG export, Total, has not been provided.

The PP/DOE are requested to provide a monitoring plan which shows a clear description of all the monitored parameters and how they will be monitored. In doing so, please include a metering diagram which shows all the metering points.