Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to include the details of each monitoring parameter listed as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
(i) the monitoring frequency for EI p,y according to the
requirements of the applicable methodology;
(ii) the QA/QC procedures to be followed for cross check, in
accordance with the requirements of the methodology (page 19);



2: The DOE is requested to include description of the process taken to validate the accuracy and completeness of the project description in VR as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 64(a).
In particular, how the production capacity of the clinker line (i.e. 3000 tonnes per day) has been validated given that the PDD indicates a total clinker production in 2009 over the maximum possible (1,182,462 tonnes, corresponding to 394 days operating at full capacity).



3: The DOE is requested to describe how the data/parameters used in the equations were verified as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 93.
(i) EIB, (the energy consumption per unit of clinker in the baseline
scenario) which has been validated as 3.59 GJ/tonne of clinker (page
38 of the VR) while the PDD indicates 3.49GJ/tonne of clinker (page
58).

(ii) NCV fuel,B; The reported values of Q fuel, b and NCVfuel,B in
the PDD (page 58) are 149,704 tonnes and 22.51 GJ/t. However, the VR reports a different NCVfuel,B value (22.83 GJ/t) (page 35) and the
same FB (3369.84 TJ), which is not consistent.

(iii) EIy , the average energy consumption in the project scenario,
which is calculated in the PDD based on the reported value of clinker
production in 2009 (1,182,462 tonnes). This figure corresponds to a
clinker production line of 3,000 tonnes per day, operating during 394
days. If the maximum production capacity as per the project
description (3,000 tonnes per day) was considered for EIy, the energy
consumption per unit of clinker in the project scenario (based on the
data of PDD, page 58) would be 3.75 GJ/tonne, which is higher than
the energy consumption in the pre-project scenario and the ex-ante
estimation of project emissions (required as per the methodology
(page 7) would be positive.



4: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular:

(i) the capacity of 5.347 MW and auxiliary consumption of 8%
applied in the calculation of annual electricity generation;
(ii) the loan/equity rate ( 65:35), depreciation and salvage value.



5: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
In particular, how it was deemed “not possible” an increase in the operational hours over 10.8% in the sensitivity analysis, considering that in 2009, the production of clinker increased 22.3% over the average clinker production considered (1,182,462 tonnes instead of 966,515 tonnes);