Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all the PDD sections for the description of the project activity as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The MoC and PDD provide inconsistent information with respect to the name of project participant. In section A.3 of the PDD, the name of PP is “PT. Sukajadi Sawit Mekar”, while in the MoC, the name of PP is “PT. Sukajadi Sawit Mekar #2”.

2: The PP/DOE are requested to indicate the reference and the versions of the applied methodology in the PDD as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The PP shall use the valid version of “Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality” at the submission of registration request.

3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
On page A-44 of VR, in the PP's response on CAR7, it points out the numbers of conventional lagoons in the baseline and project scenarios are different. However, in the NPV calculation sheet, the investment cost and O&M cost of lagoons in both scenarios are same. The DOE is requested to address the inconsistency.