Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
The DOE is requested to further clarify whether it validated if i) the EDL-Norinco finance contract (2004), ii) Dialogues with the 1st CDM consultant (2004-2006) and iii) Project approval from National Assembly (June 2005), were actions taken by the PP to secure CDM status, or were related to project implementation.

2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
The DOE is requested to explain how it validated the investment analysis considering that the spreadsheet is not replicable. For example, in the worksheet, 'IRR (without CDM), cell W46', the FIRR value is not obtained using a formula but is a punched value. The same is observed on all the worksheets. The DOE is requested to submit a revised spreadsheet wherein the FIRR can be replicated.