12:07 23 May 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to indicate in the validation report if the latest PDD template is used as per VVM v1.2, paragraph 55.
The latest available PDD template is V03 ( in effect as of July 28,2006).However, the validation report (page 10) and the header of the PDD indicate the project uses PDD template v3.1. Please clarify and correct.
2: The DOE is requested to include a clear validation opinion on the compliance of the project activity with the requirements made in EB 49 Annex 22 as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 104(c).
For project activities with a starting date on or after 2 August 2008, the project participant must inform a Host Party designated national authority (DNA) and the UNFCCC secretariat in writing of the commencement of the project activity and of their intention to seek CDM status.However, it seems that the PP notified the UNFCCC secretariat only on 21/12/2010 (page 16, validation report.
3: The DOE is requested to clarify if the list of alternatives to the project activity in the PDD is complete according to the applied baseline methodology as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 107.
Please provide information in detail with regard to elimination of similarly capable leak detection and measurement technologies as described in the methodology (step 1 of additionality section, AM0023 v03 and tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality v5.2).
4: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed each barrier presented as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118 (a) and (b).
The DOE shall provide detail information on how requirements of "GUIDELINES FOR OBJECTIVE DEMONSTRATION AND ASSESSMENT OF BARRIERS v01 EB 50 Annex 13" has been fulfilled in each presented barriers.
5: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121.
In particular : (i) how the geographical scope of the common practice analysis has been validated; (ii) how it has assessed the existence of similar projects; (iii) how the essential distinctions between the proposed CDM project activity and any similar projects are assessed.
1: The DOE is requested to indicate in the validation report if the latest PDD template is used as per VVM v1.2, paragraph 55.
The latest available PDD template is V03 ( in effect as of July 28,2006).However, the validation report (page 10) and the header of the PDD indicate the project uses PDD template v3.1. Please clarify and correct.
2: The DOE is requested to include a clear validation opinion on the compliance of the project activity with the requirements made in EB 49 Annex 22 as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 104(c).
For project activities with a starting date on or after 2 August 2008, the project participant must inform a Host Party designated national authority (DNA) and the UNFCCC secretariat in writing of the commencement of the project activity and of their intention to seek CDM status.However, it seems that the PP notified the UNFCCC secretariat only on 21/12/2010 (page 16, validation report.
3: The DOE is requested to clarify if the list of alternatives to the project activity in the PDD is complete according to the applied baseline methodology as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 107.
Please provide information in detail with regard to elimination of similarly capable leak detection and measurement technologies as described in the methodology (step 1 of additionality section, AM0023 v03 and tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality v5.2).
4: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed each barrier presented as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118 (a) and (b).
The DOE shall provide detail information on how requirements of "GUIDELINES FOR OBJECTIVE DEMONSTRATION AND ASSESSMENT OF BARRIERS v01 EB 50 Annex 13" has been fulfilled in each presented barriers.
5: The DOE is requested to report how it has validated common practice analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 121.
In particular : (i) how the geographical scope of the common practice analysis has been validated; (ii) how it has assessed the existence of similar projects; (iii) how the essential distinctions between the proposed CDM project activity and any similar projects are assessed.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: