18:42 06 May 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to explain in the PDD the methodological choices for the calculation of the baseline, project emissions, leakage and emission reductions as per PS version 1 paragraphs 50 and 51.
Specifically, the DOE is required to explain how it has validated that the default value of the flare efficiency is inline with the requirements from the version of the tool applied, as indicated in page 3 from the tool.
2: The PP/DOE are requested to list and justify in the PDD the data and parameters used to calculate the emission reductions as per PS version 1 paragraphs 52 and 53.
Specifically, the PP shall indicate which are the flare's manufacturer specifications for temperature and flow rate - applicable in case of a default value for flare efficiency.
3: The PP/DOE are requested to list in the PDD all the data and parameters to be monitored as required by the applied methodology(ies) as per PS version 1 paragraph 55.
Specifically, the PP is required to indicate in the PDD which are the parameters necessary to be measured when applying the default value for flare efficiency, as required by the version of the tool applied.
4: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology(ies) as per VVS version 2 paragraph 132 (a).
Specifically, the DOE is required to explain how it has validated the parameters needed to be monitored when applying the default value for flare efficiency.
5: The DOE is requested to report details of all CARs, CLs and FARs as per VVS version 2 paragraph 29.
Specifically, the DOE is required to detail how it has closed CAR 04 instead of raising a FAR, since the PP has explained that an evidence to prove the compliance of the project with the applicability condition of the methodology will be available when the CNG plant is commissioned and commercially viable.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to explain in the PDD the methodological choices for the calculation of the baseline, project emissions, leakage and emission reductions as per PS version 1 paragraphs 50 and 51.
Specifically, the DOE is required to explain how it has validated that the default value of the flare efficiency is inline with the requirements from the version of the tool applied, as indicated in page 3 from the tool.
2: The PP/DOE are requested to list and justify in the PDD the data and parameters used to calculate the emission reductions as per PS version 1 paragraphs 52 and 53.
Specifically, the PP shall indicate which are the flare's manufacturer specifications for temperature and flow rate - applicable in case of a default value for flare efficiency.
3: The PP/DOE are requested to list in the PDD all the data and parameters to be monitored as required by the applied methodology(ies) as per PS version 1 paragraph 55.
Specifically, the PP is required to indicate in the PDD which are the parameters necessary to be measured when applying the default value for flare efficiency, as required by the version of the tool applied.
4: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the compliance of the monitoring plan with the applied methodology(ies) as per VVS version 2 paragraph 132 (a).
Specifically, the DOE is required to explain how it has validated the parameters needed to be monitored when applying the default value for flare efficiency.
5: The DOE is requested to report details of all CARs, CLs and FARs as per VVS version 2 paragraph 29.
Specifically, the DOE is required to detail how it has closed CAR 04 instead of raising a FAR, since the PP has explained that an evidence to prove the compliance of the project with the applicability condition of the methodology will be available when the CNG plant is commissioned and commercially viable.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: