08:15 28 Apr 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all the data and parameters to be monitored in line with applied methodology as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
In particular, the PDD does not include the monitoring of NCV and density of diesel as required by the paragraph 15 (f) of AMS III Z version 03.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated that the selected baseline and monitoring methodology(ies) are correctly applied and they are not subject to clarifications, revisions or deviations as per VVM v1.2, paragraphs 72-74.
In particular, the DOE shall demonstrate why the project activity is not a debundling component of a large scale project activity considering there is a similar small scale project activity (PA 4585) which has been registered under the same methodology in the year 2011. In doing so, the DOE may refer to EB54 annex 13, paragraph 2, 3, 7.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 49 Annex 22 paragraph 8 b.
In particular, the DOE shall validate 1) whether the event "Request for deviation submitted by DNV on 16 December 2008 (M-DEV0219) that was approved at the EB48 in 11 March 2009" is specific to the proposed project activity; and 2) whether there is any documented evidence available during the gap between the ERPA signed on 28 June 2006 and the request for deviation (M-DEV0219) submitted on 16 December 2008.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all the data and parameters to be monitored in line with applied methodology as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
In particular, the PDD does not include the monitoring of NCV and density of diesel as required by the paragraph 15 (f) of AMS III Z version 03.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated that the selected baseline and monitoring methodology(ies) are correctly applied and they are not subject to clarifications, revisions or deviations as per VVM v1.2, paragraphs 72-74.
In particular, the DOE shall demonstrate why the project activity is not a debundling component of a large scale project activity considering there is a similar small scale project activity (PA 4585) which has been registered under the same methodology in the year 2011. In doing so, the DOE may refer to EB54 annex 13, paragraph 2, 3, 7.
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 49 Annex 22 paragraph 8 b.
In particular, the DOE shall validate 1) whether the event "Request for deviation submitted by DNV on 16 December 2008 (M-DEV0219) that was approved at the EB48 in 11 March 2009" is specific to the proposed project activity; and 2) whether there is any documented evidence available during the gap between the ERPA signed on 28 June 2006 and the request for deviation (M-DEV0219) submitted on 16 December 2008.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: