Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to describe on identification of baseline scenario(s) in PDD as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The DOE is requested to further assess the baseline scenario for the 5000 TPD “greenfield facility” in line with the Clarification provided by EB 61,Annex 5 .The DOE should in order to determine the baseline scenario :

1.Identify alternative design options for the 5000 TPD clinker facility along with the feasible usage of the waste energy for those designs (with/without waste heat recovery component /with a waste heat recovery component of a different denomination) that was available to the PP.

2.Undertake an investment comparison analysis for the identified alternative designs to the entire greenfield facility for the determination of the baseline scenario.

With regard to this, the DOE is requested to refer Clarification “AM_CLA_0219” on ACM0012 version 03.2 for better clarity.

2: The PP/DOE are requested to list all relevant assumptions, data, input values and references used in the investment analysis and the results of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The DOE is requested to provide further information on how it validated the components of O&M costs. In doing so the DOE shall provide an analysis as to how it deemed that the components of the O&M costs are comparable to the other similar projects. The DOE shall also substantiate whether all the components of the O&M costs are linked to the project activity only especially with respect to "Management Cost"

3: The PP/DOE are requested to present common practice analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
PDD version 07 states that 29 similar clinker production lines have been identified. The DOE validated that out of these 17 facilities were CDM project activities.The DOE is requested to provide further information on the balance 12 projects in accordance with Step 4-a and 4-b of the Additionality Tool (Version 05.2.1)