17:27 04 Jul 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
The date of notification to UNFCCC and Columbian DNA is mentioned as 21/06/2011 in PDD and 20/06/2011 in the validation report.
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
Quantitative information/ranges for input values like Capex, O&M costs of other CDM projects, used for comparison are not provided.
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
Please provide information indicating the extent of variations of the key input values that the project NPV would cross the benchmark, and discuss their likelihood.
1: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
The date of notification to UNFCCC and Columbian DNA is mentioned as 21/06/2011 in PDD and 20/06/2011 in the validation report.
2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
Quantitative information/ranges for input values like Capex, O&M costs of other CDM projects, used for comparison are not provided.
3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
Please provide information indicating the extent of variations of the key input values that the project NPV would cross the benchmark, and discuss their likelihood.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: