Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to include description of the process taken to validate the accuracy and completeness of the project description in VR as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 64(a).
in particular, a description of the energy demand in the pre-project scenario and how this energy demand has been met.

2: The DOE is requested to confirm the accuracy of the financial calculations carried out for the investment analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (c).
in particular, a) the breakdown of the annual O&M cost; b) how the input values, such as total investment, cost of natural gas and risk premium for private investment have been cross checked; c)The detail information on the sources used for cross-checking the cost of petcoke; d) The suitability of the "other fee paid to Vitro"; e) the reason why the amount of steam produced is different in 2010, 2011 and 2012 onwards.

3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 111 (e).
in particular, the PDD/VR lacks information on the sensitivity analysis of alternative 2 (Current Practice scenario)

4: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the credibility of the barrier analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118.
in particular, 1) how the DOE has validated the prevailing practice, technological barrier and other barriers (please refer to GUIDELINES FOR OBJECTIVE DEMONSTRATION AND ASSESSMENT OF BARRIERS) 2) the difference between the identified technological barrier and "other barrier" as described in the PDD