Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The VR lacks information on how the DOE has validated the emission factor for upstream fugitive methane emissions of natural gas from production, transportation and distribution (EFNG,upstream,CH4).

2: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
(a) The VR lacks information on how the DOE has validated and crosschecked the the total project costs and the O&M costs of the single cycle and combined cycle power plants in line with the VVM paragraph 111 a to c;
(b) The DOE has not provided its opinion with regards to the availability of the following input values at the time of the investment decision in line with the EB62 Annex 5 paragraph 6: (i) The total project costs; (ii) the O&M costs; (iii) the escalation of the O&M costs;
(c) The VR has not provided information on whether the actual payable tax has been taken into account in the calculation of income tax, in line with the EB62 Annex 5 paragraph 11.

3: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
Monitoring parameters - NCV of the diesel oil, and annual quantity of natural gas consumed in project activity (FCf,y) at the project end, have not been included in the montoring plan.

4: The DOE is requested to identify if the PDD has been updated and rectified according to the responses to the CARs, CLs and or FARs raised during validation as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 39.
CL12 indicates that the benchmark was derived from the average interest rates during year 2001-2005, which equals to 10%. However, the PDD mentions that the benchmark was as per year 2001-2003 which equals to 10.4%.