09:05 01 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to provide a description of steps taken to cross-check the information given in the PDD as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 88.
The Validation Report does not contain information on how the DOE has cross-checked the information given in the PDD with regard to the identification of the most plausible baseline scenario, including the identification and elimination of alternative scenarios.
2: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the credibility of the barrier analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118.
The information contained in the Validation Report merely mirrors the barrier analysis contained in the PDD; the Validation Report does not contain an assessment of each barrier listed in the PDD, which describes how the DOE has undertaken validation of the barrier and has determined the credibility of the barrier analysis performed in the PDD.
3: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
The Validation Report does not contain information on how the DOE has assessed the feasibility of the monitoring arrangements with regard to the following monitoring parameters: i) BGcombusted,y - Annual volume of biogas combusted in the boiler in year y; ii) BGflared,y - Annual volume of biogas flared in year y; iii) wCH4,y - Methane content in the biogas in year y; iv) T- Temperature of the biogas; and v) P - Pressure of the biogas.
1: The DOE is requested to provide a description of steps taken to cross-check the information given in the PDD as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 88.
The Validation Report does not contain information on how the DOE has cross-checked the information given in the PDD with regard to the identification of the most plausible baseline scenario, including the identification and elimination of alternative scenarios.
2: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed the credibility of the barrier analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118.
The information contained in the Validation Report merely mirrors the barrier analysis contained in the PDD; the Validation Report does not contain an assessment of each barrier listed in the PDD, which describes how the DOE has undertaken validation of the barrier and has determined the credibility of the barrier analysis performed in the PDD.
3: The DOE is requested to describe the steps undertaken to assess if the monitoring arrangements are feasible to be implemented within the project design as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 124(b).
The Validation Report does not contain information on how the DOE has assessed the feasibility of the monitoring arrangements with regard to the following monitoring parameters: i) BGcombusted,y - Annual volume of biogas combusted in the boiler in year y; ii) BGflared,y - Annual volume of biogas flared in year y; iii) wCH4,y - Methane content in the biogas in year y; iv) T- Temperature of the biogas; and v) P - Pressure of the biogas.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: