08:00 10 Nov 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the suitability of the input values used in the financial calculations as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 120 and 123 (a).
The DOE is requested to further explain how it has validated the input values to the investment analysis in line with the VVS version 3 paragraph , in particular: (a) how the DOE validated that as per the PPA the tariff is 2.90 INR/kWh for 20 years without any revision, however as per the PP's response to CAR B3 the tariff has been revised to Rs 3.24/kWh up to March 31, 2009 and Rs. 3.39/kWh from April 1, 2009; (b) how the DOE concluded that the O&M cost of the project is within the range of O&M costs of other projects which have the same O&M company and from same region, whereas it is shown that the O&M cost of the project is the highest, and no explanation is given.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the monitoring plan as per VVS version 2 paragraph 132 (b).
The Validation Report has not provided information how the DOE validated that meters for parameter EGL223 and EGL225 do not require calibration as per OEM (PDD page 32).
1: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the suitability of the input values used in the financial calculations as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 120 and 123 (a).
The DOE is requested to further explain how it has validated the input values to the investment analysis in line with the VVS version 3 paragraph , in particular: (a) how the DOE validated that as per the PPA the tariff is 2.90 INR/kWh for 20 years without any revision, however as per the PP's response to CAR B3 the tariff has been revised to Rs 3.24/kWh up to March 31, 2009 and Rs. 3.39/kWh from April 1, 2009; (b) how the DOE concluded that the O&M cost of the project is within the range of O&M costs of other projects which have the same O&M company and from same region, whereas it is shown that the O&M cost of the project is the highest, and no explanation is given.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the monitoring plan as per VVS version 2 paragraph 132 (b).
The Validation Report has not provided information how the DOE validated that meters for parameter EGL223 and EGL225 do not require calibration as per OEM (PDD page 32).

Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: