Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to describe the procedure taken to demonstrate additionality of the project activity as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The DOE is requested to further explain how it has validated that the simple cost analysis is suitable for the project ,in particular,i)the DOE is requested to validate the relationship between KPRL,RWAMBO and other Oil Marketing Companies (OMCs) in Kenya ii)how the DOE has validated that there will not be revenue for the PP, given that the signature date of Mombasa Refinery Processing Agreement between KPRL and RWAMBO E.A. Limited 23/11/2011 is after the starting date 28/01/2010 iii) The DOE is requested to validate the agreements signed between KPRL and other Oil Marketing Companies

2: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 76.
The DOE is requested to explain how it has validated that the emission reduction is attributed to the proposed project as per paragraph 4 of the methodology.

3: The DOE is requested to state if all values used in the PDD for the emission reduction calculations are reasonable as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92 (c).
The DOE is requested to explain how it has validated that the impact of different types of crude oil and the variation of productivity on the emission reduction calculation , given that the CD-1 unit processes two types of crude oil.