16:47 25 Jun 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 76 and 77.
The validation report (page 21) states that the proposed project activity results in a new single reservoir and the power density complies with the applicability condition. However, the PDD (page 7) states that "the proposed project activity results in new multiple reservoirs". This inconsistency should be rectified. Furthermore, the DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated that the project activity is in compliance with the applicability conditions required in ACM0002 version 12.3.0. Power density of each reservoir should be calculated and validated.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the suitability of the input values used in the financial calculations as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 120 and 123 (a).
The PDD (page 2, footnote 2) states that "the reservoir for irrigation is part of the hydroelectric project..." and the figure 3 in PDD (page 10) shows that the reservoir for irrigation is included in the project boundary. It is also noted that the Investment Cost Table in Olmos 1 IRR.xls includes the investment cost of two reservoir (Reservoir 1 and Reservoir 2). The DOE does not provide any information on whether there would be any revenue other than power production being generated by the irrigation system. Information is requested.
1: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 76 and 77.
The validation report (page 21) states that the proposed project activity results in a new single reservoir and the power density complies with the applicability condition. However, the PDD (page 7) states that "the proposed project activity results in new multiple reservoirs". This inconsistency should be rectified. Furthermore, the DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated that the project activity is in compliance with the applicability conditions required in ACM0002 version 12.3.0. Power density of each reservoir should be calculated and validated.
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the suitability of the input values used in the financial calculations as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 120 and 123 (a).
The PDD (page 2, footnote 2) states that "the reservoir for irrigation is part of the hydroelectric project..." and the figure 3 in PDD (page 10) shows that the reservoir for irrigation is included in the project boundary. It is also noted that the Investment Cost Table in Olmos 1 IRR.xls includes the investment cost of two reservoir (Reservoir 1 and Reservoir 2). The DOE does not provide any information on whether there would be any revenue other than power production being generated by the irrigation system. Information is requested.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: