17:19 12 Nov 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all relevant assumptions, data, input values and references used in the investment analysis and the results of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The O&M costs from the Anaerobic Digester are reported as $14,417 annual in the Validation Report page 38 while in the PDD page 31 and spreadsheet submitted are $14,108 annual.
The O&M costs from the Anaerobic Digester and Power generation are reported as $29,005 annual in the Validation Report page 38 while in the PDD page 31 and spreadsheet submitted are $28,579 annual. Please report consistent assumptions.
2: The PP/DOE are requested to present the sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per EB 62 Annex 5 paragraph 20.
The PDD does not present the sensitivity analysis of the investment cost comparison analysis in order to show in which scenarios the project activity would become more favourable than the alternative.
3: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The VR (page 42) states that the Wdefault is 198kg and the VSdefault is 0.5kg/hd/day for Site 1, while the PDD and spreadsheet submitted report a value of 46kg and 0.27kg/hd/day for the three Sites.
4: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE should report if the data used to calculate the ex-ante grid emission factor sourced from SENER was available at the time of commencing validation.
5: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
There is no information on the potential capacities of the equipment to be installed on the power generation equipment for the project activity, and information on what capacities have been represented in the quoted cost range (i.e. $114,000 to $326,000 USD each) assumed for the investment cost of the power generation equipment has not been provided.
6: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed each barrier presented as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118 (a) and (b).
The PDD presents a ¨technological barrier¨ in Section B.5, however the Validation Report does not provide information on its assessment.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to list all relevant assumptions, data, input values and references used in the investment analysis and the results of the investment analysis as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The O&M costs from the Anaerobic Digester are reported as $14,417 annual in the Validation Report page 38 while in the PDD page 31 and spreadsheet submitted are $14,108 annual.
The O&M costs from the Anaerobic Digester and Power generation are reported as $29,005 annual in the Validation Report page 38 while in the PDD page 31 and spreadsheet submitted are $28,579 annual. Please report consistent assumptions.
2: The PP/DOE are requested to present the sensitivity analysis of the investment analysis as per EB 62 Annex 5 paragraph 20.
The PDD does not present the sensitivity analysis of the investment cost comparison analysis in order to show in which scenarios the project activity would become more favourable than the alternative.
3: The DOE is requested to state if all assumptions/ data/references used in the PDD for emission reduction calculations are in line with the methodology as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 92(a).
The VR (page 42) states that the Wdefault is 198kg and the VSdefault is 0.5kg/hd/day for Site 1, while the PDD and spreadsheet submitted report a value of 46kg and 0.27kg/hd/day for the three Sites.
4: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
The DOE should report if the data used to calculate the ex-ante grid emission factor sourced from SENER was available at the time of commencing validation.
5: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
There is no information on the potential capacities of the equipment to be installed on the power generation equipment for the project activity, and information on what capacities have been represented in the quoted cost range (i.e. $114,000 to $326,000 USD each) assumed for the investment cost of the power generation equipment has not been provided.
6: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has assessed each barrier presented as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 118 (a) and (b).
The PDD presents a ¨technological barrier¨ in Section B.5, however the Validation Report does not provide information on its assessment.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: