Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to describe the process taken to validate the accuracy and completeness of the project description as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 64-68 and 69 (a) (b).
The cement types involved in the project activity are not described consistently within the PDD and validation report., e.g. page 2 of PDD (CEM II / B-P, CEM II/B-L and CEM IV / B), whereas CEMII/A-L is mentioned in page 5 of the PDD.

2: The DOE is requested to describe how each applicability condition of the methodology/ies is fulfilled by the project activity as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 76 and 77.
The DOE shall explain:
(a) whether blending of cement outside the cement production plants is a common practice in the host country and how the DOE has validated it.
(b) all clinker used in the project activity is produced by the cement plant that is included within the project boundary.
(c) Adequate date are available on cement types in the market. In doing so, data and information of types of cement shall be provided, in particular cement types CEMII/B-L and CEM IV/B.

3: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the project boundary and sources of GHG as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 86 and 87.
The DOE shall explain why the power generation involved in the project activity has not been included in the project boundary.

4: The DOE is requested to describe how it has assessed the application of the equations and parameters for the calculation of emission reductions as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 97 and 99 (d) (e).
The DOE shall explain how it has validated the correctness of the calculation of emission reductions. E.g. the updating of baseline benchmark of share of clinker per tonne of BC is not in line with the formula in page 10 of the ACM0005 version 7.1.

5: The DOE is requested to verify the justification of the data used for the ex-ante emission reduction calculations as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 98, 99 (a) (b) (c) and 100.
The DOE shall explain how it has validated the conservativeness of the ex-ante parameter Bblend,y (baseline benchmark of share of clinker per tonne of BC), in particular the cement types of CEM II/B-L and CEM IV/B, considering the lowest clinker share allowed for CEM II/B-L by national standard is 65%. Further, the DOE shall explain why only private cement plants have been considered in determine the baseline and baseline parameters.

6: The DOE is requested to describe how it has assessed the barrier analysis as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 125-127.
The DOE shall explain:
(a) why only private cement plants have been considering in validating the barrier of "first of its kind".
(b) how it has validated that no structured capital market in the host country is a barrier to implement the project activity.
(c) how it has validated that the CDM alleviates all those claimed barrier to a level that the project is not prevented anymore from occurring by such barriers. Further, the DOE shall explain what evidence has been checked. Please refer to page 6 of ACM0005 version 7.