Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
The DOE is requested to describe all the assumptions/ data/references listed in the PDD for the baseline identification as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 87 (a).
The DOE is requested to provide further information on the identification of the baseline alternatives and their elimination;
(a) Alternatives should be identified separately for CMM utilization and VAM destruction
(b) Barriers due to prevailing practice (such as flaring of low concentration methane) should be supported by credible documented evidence including the interpretations of the evidence and how it demonstrates the existence and significance of the identified barrier.
(c) Scenarios eliminated due to technical barriers (such as direct combustion for heat generation, safety factors) should also be supported by credible evidences with explanation of the implications.
(d) Barriers for scenarios that can be mitigated by additional financial means can be quantified and represented as costs and should not be identified as a barrier for implementation of project while conducting the barrier analysis, but rather should be considered in the framework of investment analysis (EB 50 Annex 13).