Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to state that the estimates in the PDD are reasonable for data and parameters that are monitored during implementation and are available after validation as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
Since the parameters APJ and CapPJ were used to estimate ex-ante the emission reductions, please provide further information about how these parameters were verified.

2: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
It is not clear how the DOE verified that the benefits of the CDM were a decisive factor in the decision to proceed with the project, as it is required by the Guidance on the Demonstration and Assessment of Prior Consideration of the CDM . Please, provide further information about how the company’s annual information forms include an explicit reference to the proposed project activity.

3: The DOE is requested to include a clear validation opinion on the compliance of the project activity with the requirements made in EB 62 Annex 13 as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 104(c).
The DOE is requested to use the last version of the Guidance on the Demonstration and Assessment of Prior Consideration of the CDM, since the validation report (reference /20/, pg. 47) uses the EB 41 - Annex 46, and the last version is the version 4 EB 62 - Annex 13 -.