Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to state whether the data and parameters are conservative and appropriate if they are fixed ex-ante (not need to monitor) during the project activity crediting period as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 91.
Information must be provided on how the methodology requirement was met with regard to parameter “moisture content of biomass” given that the methodology ( AMS ID v17, page 12 of 16) requires ex ante estimation based on on-site measurements for biomass moisture content whereas no ex ante on-site measurement values were presented and validated.

2: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the actions taken to secure the CDM status between the project starting date and the start of validation as per EB 49 Annex 22 paragraph 8 b.
Information must be provided with regard to how the PP/DOE proved continuing and real actions to secure CDM status by following paragraph 6(b) of EB62 Annex 13, particularly the real and continuing actions taken to secure CDM status between May 2004 and November 2007, which is longer than 3 years.

3: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
Information is required on how the DOE has validated the evidences to support that the benefits of the CDM were a decisive factor in the decision to proceed with the project in line with paragraph 6(a) of EB62 Annex 13.