15:07 22 Dec 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
The DOE stated that it has observed that there are no gaps of more than two years between efforts to secure CDM status from the project participants. However, It has not provided the information on how it has validated the effort to secure CDM status based on documented evidences. The DOE should provide the information on how it has validated the documented evidences as per EB 62 Annex 13.
The DOE is requested to provide information on how it has validated the evidence provided for prior consideration of CDM as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104(b).
The DOE stated that it has observed that there are no gaps of more than two years between efforts to secure CDM status from the project participants. However, It has not provided the information on how it has validated the effort to secure CDM status based on documented evidences. The DOE should provide the information on how it has validated the documented evidences as per EB 62 Annex 13.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: