Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE is requested to include validation opinion on the accuracy and completeness of the project description in the validation report as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 64(b).
Please provide further information on : (i) whether each power plant can be operated independently without any technical problem since it is based on canal system; (ii) if each plant can be operated independently then why the project can not be considered as a bundle project ?

2: The DOE is requested to confirm the accuracy of the financial calculations carried out for the investment analysis as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (c).
Please provide further detail information on tax and depreciation calculation.

3: The DOE is requested to include information on how it has validated the input values to the financial calculations as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 114 (a).
In particular how the DOE has confirmed following input values are valid and applicable by comparing against third party or publicly available information : (i) investment cost ( please provide detail information on cross checking); (ii) auxiliary consumption; (iii) interest on working capital; (iv)annual O&M cost and its escalation; (v) annual mill channel compensation; (vi) cess on water; (vii) depreciation rate; and (viii) insurance rate.

4: The DOE is requested to address the changes made to the project deign since the global stakeholder consultation was conducted as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 173(c).
The validation report doesn’t list the major changes made in the final version of PDD since the PDD published for the global stakeholder consultation.