06:58 29 Apr 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all sections of the PDD related to the description of the project activity as per PS version 1 paragraphs 30-34.
The DOE is requested to provide more information on the project description, in particular , a)technical specification of two CPP plants(18.7MW and 15MW), including the remaining lifetime. 2) how the power demand will be met and how these two CPP plants will be in operation in the project scenario, 3) what is the power demand in the pre-project scenario and project scenario
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the steps taken to assess the identification of the baseline scenario of the project activity as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 91-95.
The DOE is requested to substantiate how it has validated that P10 is not a possible alternative, in doing so, please submit the spreadsheet of unit cost comparison and validate the input values used in that analysis.
3: The DOE is requested to confirm the appropriateness of the underlying assumptions and the accuracy of the financial calculations carried out for the investment analysis as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 120 and 123 (c).
The DOE is requested to further validate the suitability of input values in the investment analysis, in particular , a) the PLF of the CPP plant , b)the DOE is requested to provide more cross checking of the price of the coal.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all sections of the PDD related to the description of the project activity as per PS version 1 paragraphs 30-34.
The DOE is requested to provide more information on the project description, in particular , a)technical specification of two CPP plants(18.7MW and 15MW), including the remaining lifetime. 2) how the power demand will be met and how these two CPP plants will be in operation in the project scenario, 3) what is the power demand in the pre-project scenario and project scenario
2: The DOE is requested to describe how it has validated the steps taken to assess the identification of the baseline scenario of the project activity as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 91-95.
The DOE is requested to substantiate how it has validated that P10 is not a possible alternative, in doing so, please submit the spreadsheet of unit cost comparison and validate the input values used in that analysis.
3: The DOE is requested to confirm the appropriateness of the underlying assumptions and the accuracy of the financial calculations carried out for the investment analysis as per VVS version 2 paragraphs 120 and 123 (c).
The DOE is requested to further validate the suitability of input values in the investment analysis, in particular , a) the PLF of the CPP plant , b)the DOE is requested to provide more cross checking of the price of the coal.

Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: