Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The generic CPA-DD does not contain the description of development of the sampling plan (PS for PoA version 2.0, paragraph 114).
Specifically, section I.7.2 of the PoA-DD does not contain a description of how to establish the sampling plan in accordance with the recommended outline for a sampling plan in the “Standard: Sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programme of activities” (e.g. sampling method, confidence/precision levels, sample size, etc)

2: The eligibility criteria listed in the generic CPA-DD does not cover one or some of the minimum required elements (PS for PoA version 2.0, paragraph 124)
Specifically, the following eligibility criteria need to be further substantiated:

(a) If additionality is demonstrated through investment analysis, the generic CPA-DD shall:
(i) define the input parameters that will be used in the investment analysis, together with a description of how the values for these parameters will be obtained for each CPA, or
(ii) Define technical and economic criteria with a range of values for each input parameter, which qualify a CPA for inclusion in the PoA.

(b) The generic CPA-DD shall describe how the compliance of each unit with the microscale thresholds will be demonstrated

3: The validation report does not contain an assessment on e whether the description of how to develop a monitoring plan for each of the corresponding CPAs complies with the applied methodologies, the applied standardized baselines, the other applied methodological regulatory documents and, where applicable, the “Standard: Sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programme of activities” (VVS for PoA version 2.0, paragraph 129).
The validation opinion does not contain an assessment of the establishment of the sampling plan against the requirements from the “Standard: Sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programme of activities” (e.g. sampling method, confidence/precision levels, sample size, etc)

4: The validation report does not contain an assessment on how each eligibility criterion, including the conditions that corresponding CPAs meet the requirement pertaining to the demonstration of additionality, is defined in accordance with the applicable requirements in the “CDM project standard for programme of activities”, and is verifiable as well as sufficiently objective and comprehensive to permit the assessment of the inclusion of corresponding CPAs in the PoA (VVS for PoA version 2.0, paragraph 137).
The validation report does not contain an assessment on how the compliance of each unit with the microscale thresholds will be demonstrated in the generic CPA-DD

5: The validation report does not contain an assessment on how each eligibility criterion, including the conditions that corresponding CPAs meet the requirement pertaining to the demonstration of additionality, is defined in accordance with the applicable requirements in the “CDM project standard for programme of activities”, and is verifiable as well as sufficiently objective and comprehensive to permit the assessment of the inclusion of corresponding CPAs in the PoA (VVS for PoA version 2.0, paragraph 137).
The validation report shall contain an assessment of the following criteria if additionality is demonstrated based on investment analysis: (a) how the input parameters that will be used in the investment analysis, together with a description of how the values for these parameters will be obtained for each CPA, will be defined, or (ii) how technical and economic criteria with a range of values for each input parameter, which qualify a CPA for inclusion in the PoA, will be defined.