Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: As per the PoA-DD, a team will conduct the spot check to check if the registration details are accurate, if the ICS user is not having other similar device, if the ICS is in use or not, and if household is using ICS only or started using pre project device as well. The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the implementation of such spot check, in particular to confirm that ICS user does not have other similar device. Refer to paragraph 340(a) of VVS-PoA.


2: The CME chose to account for efficiency loss as per paragraph 27(a) of the applied methodology. As per paragraph 27(a), the decrease of efficiency is considered based on the efficiency at commissioning. The CPA-DDs of CPAs 1 to 4 and CPA 6 state that as per water boiling test conducted by National Agency i.e. National Industrial and Technical Research Center the Soarehitra stove is projected to have a lifespan of at least 5.5 years and thermal efficiency of 32.2%. Similarly, the CPA-DD of CPA 5 states that as per water boiling test conducted by National Agency i.e. National Industrial and Technical Research Center the Lamasinina stove is projected to have a lifespan of 15 years and thermal efficiency of 33%. The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the application of paragraph 27(a) of the applied methodology as the CME conducted sampling to obtain parameter nnew,i,j, which is not required when paragraph 27(a) is chosen to account for efficiency loss. Refer to paragraph 359(c) of VVS-PoA.


3: The DOE is requested to explain how it validated that the same value of parameter Bold,i,j is applicable for all CPAs which are located in different areas. In doing so, the DOE shall explain which areas/regions this value of Bold,i,j covers. Refer to paragraph 359(e) of VVS-PoA.