14:20 14 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PoA view page indicates CME as Nature Club of Rajasthan and PP as Atmosfair gGmbH. Further, Appendix 3 of the verification report indicates that the monitoring report was provided by Atmosfair gGmbH (the PP). The DOE shall provide information how it complied with (a) paragraph 208 of PCP-PoA ver. 02 which requires that it’s the CME who shall prepare and submit the monitoring report to the verifying DOE and (b) paragraph 296 of VVS-PoA ver. 01 which requires that the DOE shall make public a monitoring report received from the CME.
2: The DOE has verified that the parameter “Quantity of woody biomass used by project devices in tonnes per project device (By=1,new,survey)” was determined based on questionnaires to the households. However, no information on how the DOE confirmed that the pre-project devices have been completely decommissioned and only micro-gasifiers are exclusively used in the project households in order to determine the By=1,new,survey based on questionnaires (please refer to AMS-II.G ver. 10, Parameter table 15- measurement procedures).
3: The applied methodology (AMS-III.B ver. 03, parameter Table 8-QA/QC procedures) requires to check the consistency of the NCVcharcoal,i measurements by comparing the measurement results with, relevant data sources (e.g. values in the literature, values used in the national GHG inventory) and default values by the IPCC. However, the monitoring and verification reports do not contain this information.
4: The DOE interviewed the CME representatives and collection field agents to verify the amount of charcoal produced by the project activity. The DOE shall provide information on how it verified that no other charcoal was supplied from sources other than the PoA devices and that the records from the collection agents only reflect charcoal from the PoA devices considering that another PoA (10292) shares the same geographical boundary (West Bengal) and the same technology (TLUD micro gasifiers) as this CPA (refer to the CPA-DD page 12).
5: The PoA view page indicates CME as Nature Club of Rajasthan. However, the CPA-DD (page 48) indicates that the PoA device producer and manufacturer (Sapient) invited the local stakeholders to provide comments on the proposed CDM PoA whereas the PS-PoA ver. 02 paragraph 51 requires that invitation is through the CME and VVS-PoA ver. 02 paragraph 294 which requires the verification DOE to check compliance of the included CPAs with the CDM requirements.
1: The PoA view page indicates CME as Nature Club of Rajasthan and PP as Atmosfair gGmbH. Further, Appendix 3 of the verification report indicates that the monitoring report was provided by Atmosfair gGmbH (the PP). The DOE shall provide information how it complied with (a) paragraph 208 of PCP-PoA ver. 02 which requires that it’s the CME who shall prepare and submit the monitoring report to the verifying DOE and (b) paragraph 296 of VVS-PoA ver. 01 which requires that the DOE shall make public a monitoring report received from the CME.
2: The DOE has verified that the parameter “Quantity of woody biomass used by project devices in tonnes per project device (By=1,new,survey)” was determined based on questionnaires to the households. However, no information on how the DOE confirmed that the pre-project devices have been completely decommissioned and only micro-gasifiers are exclusively used in the project households in order to determine the By=1,new,survey based on questionnaires (please refer to AMS-II.G ver. 10, Parameter table 15- measurement procedures).
3: The applied methodology (AMS-III.B ver. 03, parameter Table 8-QA/QC procedures) requires to check the consistency of the NCVcharcoal,i measurements by comparing the measurement results with, relevant data sources (e.g. values in the literature, values used in the national GHG inventory) and default values by the IPCC. However, the monitoring and verification reports do not contain this information.
4: The DOE interviewed the CME representatives and collection field agents to verify the amount of charcoal produced by the project activity. The DOE shall provide information on how it verified that no other charcoal was supplied from sources other than the PoA devices and that the records from the collection agents only reflect charcoal from the PoA devices considering that another PoA (10292) shares the same geographical boundary (West Bengal) and the same technology (TLUD micro gasifiers) as this CPA (refer to the CPA-DD page 12).
5: The PoA view page indicates CME as Nature Club of Rajasthan. However, the CPA-DD (page 48) indicates that the PoA device producer and manufacturer (Sapient) invited the local stakeholders to provide comments on the proposed CDM PoA whereas the PS-PoA ver. 02 paragraph 51 requires that invitation is through the CME and VVS-PoA ver. 02 paragraph 294 which requires the verification DOE to check compliance of the included CPAs with the CDM requirements.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: