Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Three issues below are found and the DOE is request to address the issues in accordance with the VVS-PoA paragraphs 357 – 359.
1. The CPA DD (v7) page 35 sets cap of the lumen value as 110 Lumen for solar lighting systems in this CPA 001 and if the Lumen value of solar lighting systems in an individual household is greater than 110 Lumen, value of 110 Lumen will be used to calculate emission reductions. If the Lumen value of solar lighting systems in an individual household is less than 110, actual (lesser) lumen value will be used to calculate emission reductions. It is found that the monitoring report (such as the page 19) and the spreadsheet 9181-0001 ER_MP4B4 (such as Sarala_d.lightS320_BH, cell E20) have utilized the value 116.9 Lumen as the cap to calculate the emission reductions. The DOE is requested to address this inconsistence reported in the monitoring report.

2. The monitoring report (such as the page 9) and the spreadsheet 9181-0001 ER_MP4B4 (eg. SKDRDP_Jumbostoves_KA, cell F21) have reported and utilized the value Nall as 166 to calculate the emission reduction. It is found that two installed but damaged cookstoves as indicated in the cells C125 and C189 of the same spreadsheet SKDRDP_Jumbostoves_KA. The DOE is requested to clarify why these two damaged cookstoves have been considered and not removed from the emission reduction calculation.

3. The monitoring report (such as the page 10) reports that the lighting system Sunking Pro2 has the specification of Luminosity 150 Lumen and Wattage 1.1 W, whereas pages 6 and 30 of the CPA DD (v7) specifies the specification of Sunking Pro 2 as Luminosity 160 Lumen and Wattage 3 W. It is noted that the value of 1.1 W is used for the spreadsheet 9181-0001 ER_MP4B4 (such as ER Solar Summary, cells C10 - C13) to calculate the value of cumulative capacity of CPA 001 which is to be used to demonstrate compliance of the eligibility criterion of SSC limit of CPAs as per CPA DD (v7) page 55. The DOE is requested to address this inconsistency.