Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: For CPAs 2, 3, 5 and 7, the combined scale of energy savings slightly exceeded the limit of energy savings for Type II small-scale projects. Therefore, the amount of emission reductions have been discounted based on the percentage of exceeding the small-scale limit energy savings and thus the GHG emission reductions that are claimed were capped. The DOE stated that the CME has ensured that the maximum energy saved is capped at the threshold for small scale project. However, there is no calculation which shows that the energy saved in year 2018 of the discounted emission reductions is within the threshold for type II small scale project. Refer to paragraph 364 of VVS-PoA (version 02.0).


2: The PoA-DD has corrected the frequency of the survey to annually. With this correction, it is found that the frequency for monitoring of parameter "Number of days of utilization of the project device during the year y" established in the CPA-DDs (i.e. At least once every two years (biennial)) is not in line with the frequency established in the PoA-DD. However, there is no request raised by the DOE to correct this in the future monitoring period. Refer to paragraph 328 of VVS-PoA (version 02.0).