Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
If, during the verification of a certain monitoring period, the DOE identifies that the calibration has been delayed and the calibration has been implemented after the monitoring period in consideration (i.e. the results of delayed calibration are available), the DOE may conclude its verification, provided the conservative approach is adopted in the calculation of GHG emission reductions (paragraph 366 and 367 of VVS for PA ver 2).
The validation report (p 12-13) states that “No AST was done during this monitoring period, which is considered as calibration delay. From the 5th of January, 2019 to end of the monitoring period, calibration delay has been duly considered by PP and readings were considered to be correctly recalculated using the correction factors from both QAL2 results, as applicable.” The DOE is required to provide further information on how calibration delay has been duly considered by PP as per para 366 or 367 of the VVS for PA ver 2 considering that the correction factors derived from the calibration curve of the QAL2 test are simply applied to both the N2O concentration and the volume of the tail gas to the calculated hourly average.