19:07 30 Sep 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification and certification report does not describe the implementation status of the project as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 385 (a).
Scope: The verification report does not describe the reasons for the phased-implementation delay and/or does not present the expected implementation dates as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 385 (a).
Issue: The registered PDD states two substations (i.e Pamona and Palopo substations), however the monitoring plan also mentions another substation, i.e. Latuppa substation. The DOE is requested to clarify how the implementation of the project activity has been in accordance with the registered PDD.
2: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified by the applied methodology, the standardized baseline and/or the monitoring plan as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 400.
Issue: The verification and certification report has not provided information on how the DOE verified the delayed calibration for meters measuring parameters EGgross, EGaux, FCy, and meters for export in Pamona SS and Sulawena (SN 36049567) in accordance with the VVS version 09.0 paragraph 395. Furthermore, there is no information of the calibration of meter in Sulawena (SN 36049567), that was later replaced.
3: Scope: The verification and certification report does not describe how the reported data have been cross-checked with other sources as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 403 (b).
Issue: The DOE is requested to provide information on the result or conclusion of the crosscheck of parameter EGfacility,y with the invoices raised (e.g. figures are matching, or figures are lower/higher).
4: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved nor/or confirm that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage have been followed as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 403 (c) and 409 (j).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the Losses of being 1% in the baseline emission calculation. The Validation Report and registered PDD have indicated that as per the FSR the losses can be 18.25%.
1: Scope: The verification and certification report does not describe the implementation status of the project as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 385 (a).
Scope: The verification report does not describe the reasons for the phased-implementation delay and/or does not present the expected implementation dates as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 385 (a).
Issue: The registered PDD states two substations (i.e Pamona and Palopo substations), however the monitoring plan also mentions another substation, i.e. Latuppa substation. The DOE is requested to clarify how the implementation of the project activity has been in accordance with the registered PDD.
2: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified by the applied methodology, the standardized baseline and/or the monitoring plan as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 400.
Issue: The verification and certification report has not provided information on how the DOE verified the delayed calibration for meters measuring parameters EGgross, EGaux, FCy, and meters for export in Pamona SS and Sulawena (SN 36049567) in accordance with the VVS version 09.0 paragraph 395. Furthermore, there is no information of the calibration of meter in Sulawena (SN 36049567), that was later replaced.
3: Scope: The verification and certification report does not describe how the reported data have been cross-checked with other sources as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 403 (b).
Issue: The DOE is requested to provide information on the result or conclusion of the crosscheck of parameter EGfacility,y with the invoices raised (e.g. figures are matching, or figures are lower/higher).
4: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved nor/or confirm that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage have been followed as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 403 (c) and 409 (j).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the Losses of being 1% in the baseline emission calculation. The Validation Report and registered PDD have indicated that as per the FSR the losses can be 18.25%.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: