03:02 07 Jul 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE shall determine whether the registered monitoring plan has been properly implemented and followed by the project participants and monitoring results are consistently recorded as per the approved frequency (paragraph 361 of VVS for PA).
The monitoring plan requires the annual monitoring of FCH4, j/FCH4, z/ (leak flow rate of methane for leak (j, z) from the leaking component) and taver,i (Average bag fill time for leak i) while the monitoring report (p 18-19, 20) indicates that the measuring frequency of FCH4, j/FCH4, z/ is "At least once per monitoring period" and 2) the spreadsheet shows that some of leaks were not monitoring during this monitoring period. The PP/DOE is required to provide further information on how the monitoring of these parameters are in line with the monitoring plan of the registered PDD.
2: For each parameter, the project participants shall describe the equipment used to monitor each parameter, including details on accuracy class, and calibration information (frequency, date of calibration and validity), if applicable as per the registered monitoring plan (paragraph 260 (b) of PS for PA).
The monitoring report (p 15) shows the calibration records of the Gasurveyors with serial numbers. Among 10 Gasurveyors, 4 Gasurveyors were calibrated on 26/01/2020 and 16/07/2020 while the other 6 Gasurveyors were calibrated only on 16/07/2020. The DOE (p 18) states that "calibration records to confirm it has been conducted as the frequency specified in the registered monitoring plan." The PP/DOE is required to provide further information on why 6 Gasurveyors were calibrated once in 2020 while the other 4 Gasurveyors were calibrated twice in 2020.
3: The project participants shall, for the registered CDM project activity for the monitoring period, identify the formulae used for, and provide the calculations of, the following:
(a) Baseline GHG emissions or baseline net GHG removals;
(b) Project GHG emissions or actual net GHG removals;
(c) Leakage GHG emissions;
(d) GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals (paragraph 264 of PS for PA).
The submitted spreadsheet shows that the period of emission reduction claimed for this monitoring period does not correspond to the monitoring period of this request for issuance (08 Nov 19 - 31 Dec 20). For example, Code "NA-J.6.RR.4423.1" considers the emission reduction from 14 May 2017 to 29 December 2020 while the monitoring period is 08 Nov 19 - 31 Dec 20. The PP/DOE requires to provide further information how the calculation presented in the spreadsheet corresponds to the monitoring period.
1: The DOE shall determine whether the registered monitoring plan has been properly implemented and followed by the project participants and monitoring results are consistently recorded as per the approved frequency (paragraph 361 of VVS for PA).
The monitoring plan requires the annual monitoring of FCH4, j/FCH4, z/ (leak flow rate of methane for leak (j, z) from the leaking component) and taver,i (Average bag fill time for leak i) while the monitoring report (p 18-19, 20) indicates that the measuring frequency of FCH4, j/FCH4, z/ is "At least once per monitoring period" and 2) the spreadsheet shows that some of leaks were not monitoring during this monitoring period. The PP/DOE is required to provide further information on how the monitoring of these parameters are in line with the monitoring plan of the registered PDD.
2: For each parameter, the project participants shall describe the equipment used to monitor each parameter, including details on accuracy class, and calibration information (frequency, date of calibration and validity), if applicable as per the registered monitoring plan (paragraph 260 (b) of PS for PA).
The monitoring report (p 15) shows the calibration records of the Gasurveyors with serial numbers. Among 10 Gasurveyors, 4 Gasurveyors were calibrated on 26/01/2020 and 16/07/2020 while the other 6 Gasurveyors were calibrated only on 16/07/2020. The DOE (p 18) states that "calibration records to confirm it has been conducted as the frequency specified in the registered monitoring plan." The PP/DOE is required to provide further information on why 6 Gasurveyors were calibrated once in 2020 while the other 4 Gasurveyors were calibrated twice in 2020.
3: The project participants shall, for the registered CDM project activity for the monitoring period, identify the formulae used for, and provide the calculations of, the following:
(a) Baseline GHG emissions or baseline net GHG removals;
(b) Project GHG emissions or actual net GHG removals;
(c) Leakage GHG emissions;
(d) GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals (paragraph 264 of PS for PA).
The submitted spreadsheet shows that the period of emission reduction claimed for this monitoring period does not correspond to the monitoring period of this request for issuance (08 Nov 19 - 31 Dec 20). For example, Code "NA-J.6.RR.4423.1" considers the emission reduction from 14 May 2017 to 29 December 2020 while the monitoring period is 08 Nov 19 - 31 Dec 20. The PP/DOE requires to provide further information how the calculation presented in the spreadsheet corresponds to the monitoring period.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: